Akmaludin Akmaludin, Suryanto Suryanto


Decision making process will be kept up-faced by anyone, including managers who have decision-making role in the organization that will be developed. To use of technology-based products such as notebooks become a focus for all users. Therefore, we need a method that can be used for the selection of notebooks. the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), one of the approaches of AHP is a method Multycriteria Decision Making (MCDM), MCDM method approach is to provide a solution to the user choose form technology-based products notebook. The application of MCDM method is a hierarchical model that simplifies the problem into three levels, namely Goal, Criteria, and Alternatives that can provide alternative solutions to the criteria and in accordance with the needs of the student ,  so as not to disappoint them against the electoral process in the future notebooks. Notebook products being compared must have the same class, namely Core i5 which consists of four types with different brands, namely SAMSUNG 470RE-K01ID, G470-0137 LENOVO, ASUS A450CC-WX250D, and TOSHIBA L840-1045. From this research the hierarchical model MCDM method can provide the best solutions for decision makers. Priority of test results using pakage Expert Choice Software provides output to different priority thin decision.

Full Text:



Ampuh Hadiguna, Rika. 2005. A multi Criteria approach to designing the celluler manufacturing system. Jurnal Teknik Industri Universitas Kristen Petra Vol. 7 No.1 p. 41-42.

Anagnostopoulos,KP.,Vavatsikos, AP,. 2006. An Analytic Hierarchi Process Model for construction contractor prequalification. Operational research.An International Journal Vol. 6, No. 3.p 333-346.

Asamoah, David, Annan, Jonathan & Nyarko, Samuel. 2012. Analytic Hierarchi Process Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Pharmauticeutical Manufacturing Firm in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 7, No.10; May 2012. p 49-62.

Coulter, E.D, Coakley, James, & Sessions, John. 2012. The Analytic Hierarchi Process: A Tutorial for Use in Prioritizing Forest Road Invesments to Minimize Environtment Effects. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 2012.51-69.

Forman, Ernest., Gass, Saul. 2008. [e-document]. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 86 p [Referred to on 27 10.2008]. Available:

Gilliam, S., Raymaekers, D., Muys, B. & Vans Orshoven, J..2007. Comparing multiple criteria decision methods to extend a geographical information system on afforestation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.p 142-158.

Haas, Rainer., Meixner, Olivier. 2007. [e-document]. An illustrated guide to Analytical Hierarchy Process.University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.[Referred to on 10.09.2008].

Ishizaka, Allessio, Nameray, Phillippe. 2013. A multi-criteria group decision framework for partner grouping when sharing facilities, Groups decision and negotiation. University of Portsmouth-Business School, UK. 773-799.

Kunz, Jeff. 2010. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Eagle city Hall Location Task Force. March 2010.

Saaty, TL. 1990. The Analytic Hierarchical Process. RWS Publications, Pittburgh, PA.

Saaty, Thomas L., Vargas, Luis G. 2000. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Springer (1st edition), ISBN 978-0792372677.352 p.

Saaty, TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchi process: Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1. 2008 p. 83-98.

Sen, Dilip Kumar., Dubay, Sandeep Kumar., & Talankar, Amol A. 2012. Analytical Hierarchi Process, Applied to vendor selection problem in small and medium scale enterprises. VSRD International Journal of Mechanical, automobile and production engineering, Vol. 2, No. 8 October 2012. p 287-292.

Susila, Wayan R., Munadi, Ernawati. 2007. Application of analytical hierarchical process on prioritizing research proposal. Informatika pertanian, Vol. 16 No.2 2007.p 983-998.

Tahriri,F, Osman, MR, Ali, A, Yusuf, RM, Esfandiary, A. 2008. AHP Approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company: Journal of industry Engineering and Manajement .University Putra Malaysia. JIEM 2008 Vol.1 No. 2, p 54-76: ISSN 1213-0953

Taslicali, Ali Kamil., Ercan, Sami,. 2006. The analytic hierarchi &The analytic network process in multicriteria decision making: a comparative study. Journal of aeronautic and space technologies Volume 2, Number 4, p 55-65.

Tomic, Vojislav, Marincovic, Zoran, & Jonosovic, Dragoslav. 2011. Promethee method implementation with multicriteria decisions. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 9 No. 2, 2011.p 193-202.

Zimmer, Sebastian., Klumpp, Mathias, & Abidi, Hella. 2011. Industry project evaluation with the analytic hierarchi process. Institute for logistics and service management FOM university of Applied Science Essen, Germany.

Zimmer, Sebastian., Labib, Ashraf. 2009. Analysis Hierarchi Process dan Expert Choice: Benefit and limitations. ORinsight.22(4).University of portmouth-business school, United Kingdom.p 201-220


  • There are currently no refbacks.